BREAKING NEWS! To view please Register or Login.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Russia-Turkey-Iran Brokered Agreement on Syria Brings US' Ploys to Naught
Russia-Turkey-Iran Brokered Agreement on Syria Brings US' Ploys to Naught

© AP Photo/ Hassan Ammar

MIDDLE EAST 15:49 28.12.2016(updated 15:52 28.12.2016) Get short URL92938342 Turkey and Russia have agreed on the outlines of a nationwide ceasefire plan in Syria and will submit it to Damascus to consider. Commenting upon the initiative, Turkish political scientist Salih Yılmaz explained to Sputnik why the initiative seems to be quite workable and why even the US won't be able to hamper its implementation. The framework agreement between Russia and Turkey on Syria proposes the end of hostilities in the country starting at midnight local time on December 29. © WIKIPEDIA/ BERNARD GAGNON Turkey, Russia Agree on General Syria Ceasefire Plan - Reports The general ceasefire proposal is planned to be presented to the Syrian government for consideration, Turkey's Anadolu news service reported on Wednesday. The truce agreement is subject to approval by the Syrian government and does not extend to terrorist organizations operating in the country. Should the pact hold, according to Anadolu, the Syrian government and opposition will launch peace talks in the Kazakh capital of Astana brokered by Russia and Turkey. The bilateral proposal reportedly aims to advance the political process outlined in the UN resolution on Syria. Commenting on the proposed initiative, Turkish political scientist, Prof. Dr. Salih Yılmaz from Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences spoke to Sputnik Turkiye about why this initiative might just work. "During the recent meeting in Moscow, attended by the foreign ministers from Russia, Turkey and Iran, it was agreed upon the advance of a nationwide ceasefire plan throughout all of the Syrian territory," he told Sputnik. "We are also witnessing the rapprochement between Russia and Turkey over the fight against terrorism," he said. Dr. Yılmaz further explained that the active cooperation between the two countries has resulted in the heavy losses currently experienced by Daesh and other terrorist groups which are operating in Syria. He noted however that some of the joint initiatives of Moscow and Ankara are being sabotaged by Washington. Nevertheless, operational intelligence sharing between Russia and Turkey is bringing to naught all the subversive operations undertaken by the US. © AFP 2016/ NATALIA KOLESNIKOVA 'Amid US Failure in the Middle East, Russian-Iranian Alliance Gains Momentum' "Russia, Turkey and Syria are pursuing one common goal and that is the reconciliation of all the parties in Syria and security administration of the nationwide ceasefire plan based on the territorial integrity of the Arab Republic," Dr. Yılmaz said. He further explained that if peace in Syria is set up on the basis of the territorial integrity of the country, the western countries won't be able to interfere into the processes within the Arab Republic. Thus, he said, the aim to advance the nationwide ceasefire plan throughout Syria in accordance with the principles agreed upon between the foreign ministers of Russia, Turkey and Iran is quite feasible. Moreover the joint work is ongoing on a number of other issues, which gives hope that developments can be quickly implemented. In the middle of January, he said, the Kazakh capital of Astana is set to host peace talks between the Syrian government and opposition, brokered by Russia, Iran and Turkey, who, according to the joint statement voiced after the meeting in Moscow on December 20, remain the guarantors of the future peace deal. With the participation of these three countries, which between them are the only ones able to actually influence the situation in Syria, there is no further need for the services of the US or any other western countries, he therefore concluded. Never miss a story again — sign up to our Telegram channel and we'll keep you up to speed!

Read more: BREAKING NEWS! To view please Register or Login.
Content originally from

Iraq displays joining the "trilogy" Syria , Russia and calls for the cooperation of intelligence

 Twilight News    
 13 Hours Ago
Twilight News / Iraqi Foreign Minister Ibrahim al - Jaafari announced that Baghdad hopes to join the Tripartite Group on the settlement of the Syrian crisis, which includes Russia, Iran and Turkey. 
Jaafari said in an interview with the agency "RIA Novosti" Russian This idea is on the table and that the Iraqi side is seeking to join the troika in favor of joint action, noting that Baghdad practiced mediation because stability in Syria will also affect Iraq. He said that the organization "Daesh" terrorist feet into Iraq from Syria. 
The Iraqi minister pointed out that "Baghdad is seeking to cooperate with Turkey are not hurt our sovereignty, but it is using all legal means to demand that Ankara withdraw its troops from Iraqi territory." 
Jaafari also confirmed that Baghdad hopes to continue cooperation with Russia in the field ofintelligence sharing, and even increase this cooperation, pointing out that the Russian intelligence is one of the most powerful intelligence world, and that Moscow is able to provide substantial assistance to Iraq in this area.

BREAKING NEWS! To view please Register or Login.
Content originally from

How Iran-Russia-Turkey Dialogue Can Help Solve Syria Crisis

By Federico Pieraccini

Global Research, December 28, 2016

1. Respect for the territorial integrity of Syria.

For Iran and Russia, this is an essential point. Turkey sees the danger of an autonomous Kurdish enclave in Syria as an existential threat.

The territorial integrity of Syria is high priority for Ankara.

Considerations: This agreement is an important point, but there is nothing new in terms of the respective positions of the parties. This step is just a confirmation of a certain convergence of interests between the three countries on this issue.

[How Iran-Russia-Turkey Dialogue Can Help Solve Syria Crisis]


2. Fighting terrorism in Syria.

In this case, we must distinguish what is meant by the definition of terrorism. All three countries agree with the United Nations resolution that labels Daesh and the Nusra Front as terrorist groups. The misunderstanding stems from the hidden support of Turkey to organizations like Daesh and Nusra Front, as well as other minor groups that are equally dangerous. Iran and Russia are well aware of this and are trying to implement a strategy to avert or diminish the support Ankara gives to its terrorist proxy forces.

The operation in northern Syria directed by Ankara called ‘Euphrates Shield’ employs thousands of troops belonging to Islamist-radical organizations that Russia, Syria and Iran consider to be terrorist groups.

Considerations: Joint statements, especially on a diplomatic level, speaking about combating terrorism (in the case of Ankara, this definition does not include all the Syrian opposition) are pro forma and have little practical value. No nation openly advocates for terrorism.

Compared with the operation in northern Syria, Moscow and Tehran’s divergences appeared evident with respect to Ankara’s position. Even more difficult to comprehend is the distinction made by Ankara between terrorists and rebels.

3. End of hostilities across Syrian territory.

Iran and Russia have for months, even years now, asked the Turks, Saudis and Americans to indicate which terrorist groups among the factions that make up the Syrian opposition are to be considered ‘moderate’ and which extremist – a trivial distinction between legitimate and illegitimate fighters. Moscow and Tehran’s position has not changed over the past eighteen months. However, the Turks, Americans and Saudis do not intend to give up on the terrorists; this much appears clear. Otherwise the war would have already been over.

Considerations: Agreeing on the cessation of hostilities is another example of pure diplomatic forms of expression. No progress will be made as long as Ankara continues to support terrorism in Syria.

Differences that emerged from the press conference:

1. The role of Hezbollah

The Turkish foreign minister said that one of the main conditions for ending hostilities in Syria is ending support for Hezbollah on Syrian territory, seeking to equate the Lebanese organization with radical Islamists involved in Operation Euphrates Shield. Such attempts at equivalence has accentuated the differences between the Turks on the one hand and the Iranians and Russians on the other.

Zarif, the Iranian minister, commenting on the words of the Turkish colleague, responded with a terse, «There are differences on this subject». Interestingly, Lavrov, referring to Hezbollah, commented on the words of Muallem in a positive tone.

Considerations: The position of Ankara in this case is buttressed by the money that Qatar largely uses to finance Erdogan. The influence of the Muslim Brotherhood, with its visceral hatred for Hezbollah, makes itself felt even in such meetings. It is unlikely that Ankara and Tehran will be able to reconcile their respective points of view over this delicate issue.

2. The invitation to Syria.

Lavrov noted that Iran, Russia and Hezbollah were invited to Syria, in contrast to Turkey and the international coalition, who operate without authorization from Damascus.

The Turkish foreign minister reiterated that the operation in Syria is legitimate so long as it is aimed at combating Daesh. It is the same excuse used by the international coalition, by the media and by politicians to justify the blatant violation of Syria’s sovereignty.

Muallem reiterated the intention of Ankara to return the occupied territories reconquered from Daesh once the operation in Syria is over. It is a statement that will be put to the test at the appropriate time, and about which there are many doubts.

The serious concerns of Moscow and Tehran over the Turkish operation in northern Syria have pushed Ankara to declare in advance that it will not remain in permanent possession of the invaded territory.

Considerations: Ankara does not intend to ask Damascus directly to cooperate, so it feels authorized to enter Syrian territory without the necessary invitation. It looks like some kind of agreement exists whereby Damascus does not attack Turkish troops in the north of Syria in exchange for Ankara renouncing its «Assad Must Go» policy. This is unwritten binding agreement that will exist as long as Turkey keeps open a channel of dialogue with it Russian and Iranian colleagues.


The dialogue between these three nations has only probably marginally affected the aspects discussed in the press conference. Undoubtedly, following the liberation of Aleppo, the need arose, especially for Moscow, to obviate any desperate moves from the defeated party.

Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United States have no intention of seeking a dialogue or changing their rhetoric. Probably as a result of Trump, this trio will have less influence in the coming months. Ankara appears to be the country most involved in the Syrian war at this point, and a dialogue with Syria, Iran and Russia is necessary and its continuation has been agreed to by all parties in spite of all the great differences that remain.

The possibility of a grand accord appears highly unlikely, and this does not appear to be the purpose of these meetings. Such high-level encounters involving defense ministers seem to be more of a clearinghouse between allied nations (Russia and Iran on behalf of Syria) and nations opposing Damascus (Turkey – the stand-in for Qatar and the United States?), designed to avoid the risk of further escalation in Syria.

The liberation of Aleppo raises important questions. How will Turkey react when Russians and Syrians begin to push toward Idlib or Al Bab? And in the future, when they will focus their aim on Raqqa and Deir ez-Zor?

These are legitimate questions and doubts.

Seeing as how the Iranians, and especially the Russians, operate, it is more than normal to have a place to discuss and be able to confront the counterparties. The main goal is always to avoid accidents or worse. This, however, does not mean that agreements are going to come about in the near future. Dialogue is one thing; cooperation is another. It is important to be aware of this in order not to overestimate the outcomes of these trilateral meetings.

BREAKING NEWS! To view please Register or Login.
Content originally from

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Last Post: OOTW
  Putin signs law suspended plutonium disposition agreement with Washington OOTW 0 78 11-01-2016, 12:48 PM
Last Post: OOTW
  Russia threatens "symmetrical" response to new U.S. sanctions Butifldrm 0 70 10-17-2016, 04:24 PM
Last Post: Butifldrm

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)